packaging as content

June 6, 2009

Zero-Gravity Coke Packaging

No, nothing to do with Coke Zero. This post is actually a follow-up to the Canada Dry space-branding of Astronaut Water.

Coca-Cola is another of those companies that has sought borrowed interest and outer-space glamour from the space program:

In 1985, astronauts tested the “Coca-Cola Space Can” [on left) aboard the Space Shuttle Challenger. The experiment was not really a success, due to the lack of refrigeration and the zero gravity conditions, but on the lighter side of space, floating “soda balls” did provide a source of entertainment for the astronauts.

from Coca-Cola-Art.com

Coca-Cola, however, did not confine their testing to NASA. Exemplifying the new sort of partisan/non-partisan posture that transnational companies can now assume, Coke also sought help from Russian cosmonauts. In 1991 aboard the Soviet space station Mir, a new & improved version of their “Space Can” was put through its paces.

(More weightless Coca-Cola packaging, after the jump…)

Fluids Generic Bioprocessing Apparatus

The 3rd trip was in 1995, this time with the Coca-Cola Space Dispenser on board (Aka the FGBA or “Fluids Generic Bioprocessing Apparatus”). The dispenser was designed to contain 1.65 liters each of Coca-Cola and Diet Coke and provide astronauts the opportunity to enjoy a refreshment break. They had to dispense their drink into a “Fluids Transfer Unit” (a sealed drinking cup) through a quick connect on the dispenser. To save power, the dispenser would chill the liquid when it was about to be consumed. As the drink passed from the storage container to the drinking can, it would flow past cooling coils that would chill it, one drink at a time.

from Coca-Cola-Art.com

Although the FGBA is more of a zero-gravity soda-fountain approach, rather than a single-serve space pack (like the can) it appears from the photo below that Coca-Cola was still entertaining options like the plastic Coke bottle with collapsible inner pouch on left. (Quite reminiscent of baby bottle liners, no?)

As strange and amusing as it is to contemplate a branded outer space, the underlying trend seems to have been towards a privatization of the space program(s).

Last year, PepsiCo Inc. paid $5 million to the agency to tow a giant soda can into orbit for a series of commercials featuring space-walking cosmonauts. “The Russians are selling their souls because they need hard currency,” said Marco Antonio Caceres, a space analyst at the Teal Group, a Fairfax (Va.) aerospace researcher.

The Russians aren’t the only ones exploiting commercial possibilities. NASA recently accepted $1.5 million from Coca-Cola Co. to install a futuristic soda machine aboard the space shuttle Endeavour so astronauts could have the Real Thing during a 10-day flight. In fact, U.S. companies have more than doubled their investment in space since 1990, to more than $7 billion.

Business Week 1997

In the current economic conditions, that particular carbonated “bubble” may have now burst, but what I’d like to know is—(since the the FBGA provided both)—which beverage did American astronauts & Russian cosmonauts find was best suited for their weightless consumption: regular Coke or Diet?

Randy Ludacer
Beach Packaging Design

3 Responses to “Zero-Gravity Coke Packaging”

Graz says:

August 12, 2009 at 5:47 am

I was thinking of making one of these traps. Do you know if they work well? Are they worth it?
Thanks for the pictures as well. They’ll be very helpful if I decide to build this!
Randy Ludacer says:

August 12, 2009 at 10:47 am

Hi Graz, Thanks for commenting.
If you’re in an area where greenhead flies are biting, these traps are definitely worthwhile. Even one hungry & persistent greenhead fly can make a person pretty miserable. Capturing that one fly spares you those bites. And our trap has taken quite a few greenhead flies out of circulation.
Graz says:

August 12, 2009 at 12:56 pm

Thanks for getting back to me Randy.
Building one (or a few) of these will definitely be this weeks project. I’m not sure if you’re familiar with the Jersey Shore, but my family recently got a home in Barnegat, and it’s very beautiful. The only thing that sucks about it, are the greenhead flies!
I see that one of the traps pictured is utilizing a black painted milk gallon (or some other type of bottle) as a lure. Do you find that the use of the lure captures more flies than the traps without the lure?
THANKS for all of your help!